UK Customs Service Postpones Blockchain-Driven Border Project Until After Brexit

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has delayed further work on a successful blockchain project in the wake of Brexit, according to a written parliamentary statement published Feb. 7.

The question about the distributed ledger project for customs needs was raised in the Q&A section on the United Kingdom Parliament’s website. On Jan. 30, Member of Parliament (MP) Eddie Hughes asked whether the government plans to use blockchain for customs systems after the U.K. leaves Europe. He also requested an update on a previously announced trial of the technology.

In response, the financial secretary to the U.K. Treasury, MP Mel Stride, explained that the project involved the development of a permissioned blockchain “that could be used to inform a trader’s ‘Authorised Economic Operator’ status.” Stride also reported that the pilot was trialed for six weeks and “established that government could use Blockchain to securely share the results of sensitive risk checks to improve the efficiencies of certain customs processes.”

However, the MP reported, further development of the solution would require significant work from HMRC and thus has been postponed “until after the U.K. leaves the EU when timescales and cost will be revisited.”

The financial secretary also revealed that the work might continue under the aegis of the Brexit-focused Future Borders Programme, as a part of their trading initiative.

The application of blockchain for customs needs was first announced by HMRC in September 2017 in what appears to be a separate initiative. Back then, the watchdog decided to examine using blockchain to make the border technologically ready for when the U.K. leaves the EU. After Brexit, the country’s customs will reportedly have to handle five times as many declarations than it currently does.

In June 2016, U.K. citizens voted to leave EU, with the country now scheduled to leave the Union on March 29, 2019. However, parties within U.K. have not yet come to a conclusion on how in particular the country is going to deal with various issues, such as trading, citizens’ rights of residence and the border with Ireland.

As Cointelegraph previously reported, United States Customs and Border Protection also launched its own blockchain test to trial the use of decentralized technology in its shipment tracking system.


Source
Author: Ana Berman
Image Credit

Can the Commonwealth be good for post-Brexit Britain?

China understands the value of the Commonwealth. Between 2006 and 2016, the country’s total trade with the historic organisation of 53 nations grew by 8.4 times and is now valued at nearly £200bn. That’s an awful lot of power plants, motorways, food, steel and solar panels.

This week leaders of the Commonwealth, which accounts for a third of the world’s population (and 40% of people under the age of 30), gather in London for the annual Heads of Government summit.

Alongside protecting the oceans and international development support, trade and investment will be high on the agenda.

Prime Minister Theresa May is scheduled to speak at the opening business forum on Monday, and will make much of the commercial opportunities available to the Commonwealth club.

With Britain officially scheduled to leave the European Union next year, one question has regularly cropped up in the Brexit debate.

If the UK needs to play a greater role on the world stage, isn’t the Commonwealth a ready-made springboard – a grouping of countries with broadly the same legal structures and democratic outlooks that are ideal partners for a post-EU Britain?

Shouldn’t the UK be seeking out some of the success China has so clearly had? The simple answer is yes.

Trade with “the Commonwealth” – and particularly its substantial African and Asian members such as Nigeria and India – has often fallen short of expectations, given the historic ties between Britain and the rest of the organisation.

But whatever successes may be ahead, it is important to keep the potential in perspective. After all, Commonwealth nations take just 9% of UK exports of goods and services, while the EU takes 43%.

The organisation is also not a formal trading alliance with the same powers as or global heft of the EU.

Critics of those that argue the Commonwealth may be able to replace any lost trade with the EU point out that being a member of both is not mutually incompatible.

Indeed, many Commonwealth countries such as India backed the UK remaining in the EU, seeing it as good for Indian businesses that use Britain as a base for European operations.

According to a recent report, trade between countries such as India and the 27 nations of the remaining EU has tripled since 2000. At the same time, UK-India trade has stayed “largely static”, revealing that the “Commonwealth effect” is often over-played.

‘Incredibly important’

The Commonwealth leadership itself is also careful to keep its distance from the Brexit debate.

I asked the Secretary General, Baroness Patricia Scotland, whether leaving the EU might be good for UK-Commonwealth trade as Britain would be freer to sign new free trade deals with members.

Indeed, Canada, the second most valuable Commonwealth member to the UK in terms of trade (Australia is first), has already signalled that any new free trade deal with Britain could have more impact than the Canada-EU agreement.

“I think Britain is an incredibly important member of the Commonwealth,” she said. “And whether Britain decided to say within or without the EU, that relationship with the Commonwealth was always going to be there.

“Now there’s a strong argument to say that no longer being part of the EU could give the UK – if it chose – greater liberality in the way in which it did deals. But you’ll know that there are many advantages and disadvantages [of Brexit].”

Baroness Scotland added: “The good thing is, whether the UK was within the EU or without the EU, the Commonwealth [trade] advantage would and is still there, and I’m delighted that the spotlight now is on the advantage.”

The Commonwealth secretariat claims that intra-Commonwealth trade could increase to $1trn (£700bn) by 2020 – well above the $560bn recorded in 2016.

New trade finance facilities to be agreed at this week’s summit in London and new free trade agreements between a selection of Commonwealth nations (such as the African Continental Free Trade Area) should help.

And the more free trade there is within the Commonwealth – which is instinctively non-protectionist – the more the UK can gain.

Britain is the leading source of “greenfield investment” funding within the organisation, for example. “I think that’s really exciting when you think about what a troubled and troubling time we live in,” Baroness Scotland said about intra-Commonwealth trade growth.

“And the fact that all these countries speak the same language, have the same political opportunities in terms of democracy and institutions and share the same common law, it’s a real platform to go forward. And I don’t think the world has needed the Commonwealth more than it needs it now.”

That is possibly especially true for post-Brexit Britain.


 

Here at Dollar Destruction, we endeavour to bring to you the latest, most important news from around the globe. We scan the web looking for the most valuable content and dish it right up for you! The content of this article was provided by the source referenced. Dollar Destruction does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or other materials on this page. As always, we encourage you to perform your own research!

Source

Author Kamal Ahmed 

Image Credit