Stock Market Giant Nasdaq and VanEck Will Offer Bitcoin Futures

The world’s second largest stock exchange Nasdaq has announced partnership with U.S. investment firm VanEck aiming at bringing a host of new regulated cryptocurrency financial products to market, including Bitcoin futures.

CoinDesk reported that the partnership was officially unveiled during Consensus: Invest conference. The move to “bring a regulated crypto 2.0 futures-type contract” to the market was announced by Gabor Gurbacs, VanEck’s director of digital asset strategy.

Soon after, Gabor Gurbacs took to Twitter to say the partnership is between Nasdaq and VanEck’s MVIS Indices. Its intention is to bring to market transparent, regulated and surveilled digital assets products, such as Bitcoin futures contracts.

In his tweet, Gabor Gurbacs indicates that new products will use Nasdaq’s SMARTS Market Surveillance system, a cross-market, cross-asset, multi-venue surveillance tool that correlates real-time and historical data with detection patterns to trace illegal market activities such as spoofing and wash trading.

More details are expected to be revealed soon, however, Gurbacs said that upcoming products could be thought of as an “upgrade” to current regulatory standards that surround Bitcoin futures.

Describing SMARTS as a “big policeman engine,” Gurbacs insists the technology would ensure Bitcoin futures trading “in a fair and orderly fashion.”

As of today, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has approved two Bitcoin futures products – one operated by the Chicago Board Options Exchange in partnership with Gemini Exchange and the other operated by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in partnership with Crypto Facilities.

These futures contracts are cash-settled, meaning that at expiration no “physical” bitcoins need to be moved in order to settle accounts.

A rival Bitcoin futures product by Bakkt is expected to be launched in January 2019 and will be physically-settled, meaning investors holding these contracts at expiration would receive payment in BTC.

As of press time, it has not been confirmed whether the Nasdaq/VanEck’s futures contract will be cash-backed, or physically settled.

Author: Forklog
Image Credit


Three pieces of legislation will be brought before Congress by the co-chair of the Congressional Blockchain Caucus. Their intent is to streamline the growing industry by introducing concise and transparent guidelines for businesses and investors, while also providing a safe harbor for taxpayers who use cryptocurrencies.   



Congressman Tom Emmer (R-MN) announced September 21 that he will be introducing three bills aimed at supporting blockchain technology and digital currencies.

In an official release, the Congressman said:

The United States should prioritize accelerating the development of blockchain technology, and create an environment that enables the American private sector to lead on innovation and further growth, which is why I am introducing these bills.

Emmers also asserted that legislators ought to be working towards embracing the emerging technologies as, well as providing a regulatory system which allows them to further advance.

Emmer’s position is in line with the overall legislative approach that the CFTC is urging for. As the Bitcoinist reported September 15, the Commission’s Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo said:

I’m advocating the same approach to cryptocurrencies and all things having to do with this new digital revolution of markets, and of currencies, and of asset classes.


The first bill that the congressman will push for is named “Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act” and it will create a safe harbor from state licensing requirements for non-custodial entities in the field. In other words, intermediaries which facilitate cryptocurrency operations without taking control of consumer funds won’t have to register as a money transmitter.

The next bill is called “Safe Harbor for Taxpayers with Forked Assets Act” and it attempts to provide protection from penalties for those taxpayers who benefit from a forked cryptocurrency.

Lastly, the Emmers will introduce a resolution which provides overall support for the cryptocurrency industry and its further development within the country.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.


Image Credit

FinCEN Says It Now Receives 1,500 Crypto Complaints a Month

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) receives more than 1,500 reports every month from financial institutions regarding cryptocurrencies, a top official said Thursday.


FinCEN director Kenneth Blanco, speaking at the Chicago-Kent Block (Legal) Tech Conference, discussed the role his agency takes in regulating cryptocurrencies. He noted that while cryptocurrencies can prove beneficial for certain use cases, they also create opportunities for bad actors such as financial criminals, terrorists and rogue states.

Blanco emphasized the importance of Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filings – a type of document that financial institutions must file following a suspected incident of money laundering or fraud. FinCEN receives more than 1,500 SARs every month regarding suspicious activities involving cryptocurrency transactions, he said.
These reports come from both traditional financial institutions and cryptocurrency exchanges, he said.


He explained:
“It was filings by both banks and other virtual currency exchanges that provided critical leads for law enforcement. This information included beneficial ownership information, additional activity attributed to the exchange of which we were previously unaware, jurisdictional information, and additional financial institutions we could contact for new leads. All of this was obtained through SARs and the supporting documents filed by financial institutions.”

Blanco also discussed FinCEN’s role in the crypto space more broadly, explaining that the regulator has worked for years in the cryptocurrency field, with a focus on “exchanges, administrators and other persons involved in money transmission” related to cryptocurrencies.

He justified the agency’s legal standing in the field by noting that cryptocurrencies acting as a substitute for fiat currencies are covered by a 2011 rule FinCEN issued regarding money service businesses that provide money transmission services.
In addition, Blanco noted that the agency has been working closely with other regulators, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on “policy development and regulatory approaches” related to cryptocurrency.

Blanco referenced initial coin offerings (ICOs) during his remarks, noting that “this rapidly growing area has gained a lot of recent public attention.” He specifically cited fraud around the fundraising method as an area of focus.

He continued:
“While ICO arrangements vary and, depending on their structure, may be subject to different authorities, one fact remains absolute: FinCEN, and our partners at the SEC and CFTC, expect businesses involved in ICOs to meet all of their [anti-money laundering/combating the financing of terrorism] obligations. We remain committed to taking appropriate action when these obligations are not prioritized, and the U.S. financial system is put at risk.”

Here at Dollar Destruction, we endeavour to bring to you the latest, most important news from around the globe. We scan the web looking for the most valuable content and dish it right up for you! The content of this article was provided by the source referenced. Dollar Destruction does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or other materials on this page. As always, we encourage you to perform your own research!

Author: Muyao Shen
Image Credit

Don’t forget to join our Telegram channel for Crypto, Business & Technology news delivered to you daily.
DD Telegram

CFTC Says Buyer Beware in New ICO Advisory

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued an advisory on initial coin offerings (ICOs) and crypto-assets, warning would-be buyers to do their homework before investing.

Its “Customer Advisory: Use Caution When Buying Digital Coins or Tokens” mirrors, in some ways, words of caution that have come out of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. That agency’s most famous warning to date is, perhaps, its fake “HoweyCoin” ICO website, which humorously warned investors about the risk involved in token sales, particularly those that offer outsized returns.

And while the SEC has focused on the side of crypto-assets that may run afoul of securities law – with some synergies between the two sides taking place – the CFTC appears to be moving to clarify where such assets may be considered the types of financial products it regulates.

The agency noted that “digital tokens and coins can also be derivatives or commodities, depending on how they are structured.” Back in 2015, the CFTC first said that it considers cryptocurrencies like bitcoin to be commodities, and today’s missive indicates that some of the crypto-assets coming out in the market today could fall under the agency’s purview.

To date, much of the CFTC’s public-facing work in this area has been focused on targeting fraud within the U.S.

The agency has filed several civil lawsuits since the start of the year, and the CFTC is reportedly involved in an ongoing probe into cryptocurrency market manipulation.

Here at Dollar Destruction, we endeavour to bring to you the latest, most important news from around the globe. We scan the web looking for the most valuable content and dish it right up for you! The content of this article was provided by the source referenced. Dollar Destruction does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or other materials on this page. As always, we encourage you to perform your own research!

Author: Stan Higgins 
Image Credit

Don’t forget to join our Telegram channel for Crypto, Business & Technology news delivered to you daily.

Federal Judge Wavers As CFTC Seeks Injunction in Crypto Fraud Case

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is wrapping up its case against CabbageTech owner and accused crypto-fraudster Patrick McDonnell – but the hearings in New York this week have been anything but simple.

The U.S. regulator is seeking a permanent injunction against McDonnell, who allegedly defrauded investors out of nearly $500,000, according to a lawsuit the CFTC filed in January.

The case has already seen notable developments on the regulatory front, including a ruling from March that backed the agency’s argument that cryptocurrencies are a form of commodity.

While a ruling on the permanent injunction was anticipated on Wednesday in New York, U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein for the Eastern District of New York pushed closing arguments to Thursday – largely due to the continued absence of McDonnell, who appeared in court Monday but did not on either subsequent day.

Indeed, Weinstein expressed concern about the case’s conclusion, stating that the proceedings were “in effect…a criminal case” at multiple points during the first three days.

At the heart of the issue is the burden of proof. Civil suits must be proven by a “preponderance of evidence” but not “beyond a reasonable doubt.” A preponderance is a lighter burden of proof than would be seen in a criminal case, he noted.

Weinstein further noted that McDonnell could object to the case against him based on the burden of proof. He also added that because McDonnell is defending himself, he might be forced to give up his Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.

As Weinstein explained on Wednesday:

“I continue to be concerned about a very basic [issue] … the right of the defendant to have a jury. He’s faced with the Fifth Amendment problem because [he is representing himself]. It is disturbing that a crime – and it is a crime, what’s been [discussed] – is proved by a preponderance [of evidence] and not a reasonable doubt.”

Plaintiff absence

McDonnell hasn’t been present since he lost a bid to have the suit dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.

And rather than having him testify, the CFTC showed clips of a video deposition recorded last month in connection with the case.

According to Weinstein, the way the hearing played out actually opens the door to a new motion to dismiss, through which he could claim that the evidence put forward against him is insufficient for a criminal proceeding.

This is something that the judge mentioned before during the proceedings.

On Monday, Weinstein told McDonnell to “make a motion that the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt because of the nature of the charges and the fact that this evidence will be used against you should you be prosecuted for a crime based on these facts alleged and that the evidence that you are forced to give in order to defend yourself will be denied.”

While he then denied the motion, he told McDonnell that “you may have it for purposes of appeal.”

Closing arguments

Weinstein indicated on Wednesday that he wants to give McDonnell yet another chance to argue in his own defense.

“I’m concerned about the actions of the defendant but I didn’t want to hold him in contempt,” he said.

He told the lawyers representing the CFTC to ensure McDonnell knows he is welcome to appear in court on Thursday to make a closing argument as well as the possible motion to dismiss.

It is unclear at this point whether McDonnell will do so.

In a letter to the court on Wednesday, he wrote that “my life is being lived hand-to-pocket sir with [this] case leaving me financially destitute with all debtors extended beyond extension.”

“For the sake of pure minute-to-minute survival, I must continue to be removed from proceeding but will give it very serious consideration if current financial conditions change,” he wrote.

Here at Dollar Destruction, we endeavour to bring to you the latest, most important news from around the globe. We scan the web looking for the most valuable content and dish it right up for you! The content of this article was provided by the source referenced. Dollar Destruction does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or other materials on this page. As always, we encourage you to perform your own research!

Author: Nikhilesh De
Image Credit

Don’t forget to join our Telegram channel for Crypto, Business & Technology news delivered to you daily.

Banks And Cryptocurrencies Global Evaluation: Americas

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) chairman Chris Giancarlo said he doesn’t see comprehensive crypto legislation coming from the federal level in the near future, CNBC reported April 30. Earlier this day, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Robert Jackson called the initial coin offerings (ICO) market a prime example of an unregulated securities market vis-a-vis the issue of consumer protection in ICOs.

These statements can be read as another sign of the inevitable future regulation of cryptocurrencies. A common trend seems to show that there’s no turning back from government oversight into crypto dealings, and the US, Canada, and other players in the western hemisphere are paving the way for global understanding and regulation of digital markets.

The following assessment of cryptocurrency regulation in the Americas is part of a larger series of pieces evaluating regulation of the flourishing global fintech industry. Part one of the series looks at activity in Asian hotspots like Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, and how governments are facilitating or hindering growth. Part two examined crypto regulation and the critical attitudes held by many European leaders.

The United States

In terms of regulation in the US, all eyes are on the SEC and CFTC. These federal agencies, which are tasked with both protecting investors and facilitating open, transparent, and competitive financial markets, will play a significant role in facilitating mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency.

Crypto assets are currently subject to securities laws under the Securities Act 1933, but the outdated regulatory framework makes governing many diverse business plans tricky. The SEC requires trading platforms to register as exchanges with the agency, for lack of better characterization, digital assets are defined as securities and fall under the jurisdiction and regulatory purview of the SEC.

Another important federal agency in the mix is the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which considers cryptocurrency as property for federal tax purposes. It formed an investigative team in Feb. 2018, which will scrutinize fiat exchanges for tax evasion and work alongside international criminal agencies to investigate unlicensed exchanges.

Likewise, the American banking sector is taking a cautious approach to crypto dealings.

Prominent US. Banks JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup initiated a global trend to ban the purchase and transfer of virtual currencies with debit and credit cards in February. JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup cited the fluctuating price of Bitcoin and general volatility of the crypto market as reason for the changes in policy, however, they have voiced a willingness to review policies as the market evolves.

Some banks are refusing to process international wire transfers for accounts associated with cryptocurrency, and some decline Bitcoin futures trading on US exchanges. In many instances, businesses associated with cryptocurrency are having difficulty forming constructive relationships with banks.

However, Goldman Sachs, the poster child of the traditional banking sector, recently hired a crypto trader as vice president of digital asset markets after increasing client demand for access to the new tech arena. Various Goldman Sachs and Wall Street executives are reportedly leaving their careers in traditional banking for work in the cryptocurrency sector.

Although many prominent banks have moved to ban use of virtual currency, this doesn’t mean they are opposed to the technology. Blockchain networks could eliminate high structural costs of financial services, provide a shared ledger that minimizes risk for banks, and strengthen regulatory reporting of banking activity.

The US based tech company R3 first initiated a Blockchain project to build a new operating system for the banking industry in late 2015, since then over 70 of the world’s largest financial institutions have joined forces to lead research and development of distributed ledger technology. The group announced the pilot launch of a trade finance platform in February, which aims to develop an open-trade finance network to simplify processing across supply chains.

JP Morgan quit R3 in April to develop its own interbank payment platform, Quorum, using the Ethereum Protocol. JP Morgan and the National Bank of Canada successfully tested the Blockchain platform this month, which is described as enterprise-focused and uses distributed ledger technology to provide transparent access to regulators while protecting the privacy and anonymity of customers.

The United States Postal Service filed a patent last September with provisions for a Blockchain-based system to authenticate user information and secure online transactions, which marks a trend of more companies filing Blockchain patents in the US.


The cryptocurrency industry operating in Canada’s highly developed economy existed for years without much government interest, but Canadian authorities have jumped on the regulation bandwagon after global financial agencies began applying more scrutiny to virtual exchanges and fraudulent ICOs earlier this year.

Canada’s Standing Committee on Finance, FINA, passed amendments on pre existing finance laws in 2014 to update laws to include cryptocurrency, require crypto firms to register with the agency, and prohibit banks from dealing with businesses not registered with the agency.

The changes have not gone into effect but FINA is reviewing the amendments that were passed and potentially applying more regulations. The committee publishes proposed regulations every Saturday through the government publication, the Gazette.

Crypto advocates play an active role in assuring regulations properly address shortcomings of the industry without hindering its growth, and are invited to provide testimonies at FINA committee hearings. While Bitcoin itself is not regulated, advocates urge regulators to consider how peripheral businesses that individuals use to access virtual markets exert substantial influence.

Canadian crypto firms have not seen as much government involvement and investigation of ICOs in comparison to their American counterparts, but as of April 6, the Ontario Securities Commission made various inquiries into the operations of crypto firms and may begin enforcing pre existing securities laws. In line with attitudes of the US SEC, Canadian regulations will seek to facilitate the growth of the crypto industry, not restrict.

Banks, on the other hand, have different concerns. The Bank of Montreal, Scotiabank and Toronto Dominion Bank, three of Canada’s biggest, banned purchase of cryptocurrency with debit and credit cards in February, following the lead of US banks.

Despite the ban, a fintech company based in Vancouver, Mogo, announced it will provide a simplified service for Canadians to buy and sell Bitcoin just days after major banks banned exchanges.

On a separate note, the Canadian government and banks have both taken an interest in Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). The government announced the launch of a Blockchain-based system, Known Traveller Digital Identity, which provides a secure platform for cross-border travellers to transfer personal information to government agencies.

The Royal Bank of Canada announced it will allow purchase of virtual currency only under certain circumstances. However, the bank also filed a patent last year for a Blockchain-based credit score platform used to make credit score calculations more transparent.
Likewise, Toronto-Dominion Bank filed a Blockchain patent with the US in 2016 for a new point-of-sale system to digitally track asset transfers.

Canada’s first ever Blockchain-based Exchange Traded Fund received approval from Canadian authorities earlier this year. The fund began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange in February and deals with various DLT corporations.

The Canadian Securities Exchange introduced a Blockchain-based securities clearing and settlement platform to enable companies to issue equity and debt through tokenized securities in February. The issuance of security tokens will be subject to regulation by the securities commission.

The National Research Council of Canada also announced its experimentation with the Ethereum Blockchain in January to test the use of public Blockchains in the transparent administration of government grants and funding.


The crypto industry has a promising future in Mexico, which been named as a leader in Latin America. More than half of the population doesn’t have access to traditional banks accounts and rapidly eroding citizen trust in financial institutions presents a big opportunity for crypto platforms in the future. Only 50 fintech companies were operational in 2015, but by 2017 that number reached over 2,000.

Mexico’s senate passed a bill to regulate cryptocurrencies, and is awaiting President Pena’s signature, to legitimize its use, and promote stability in the market. The bill requires crypto operators to register with the Bank of Mexico as ‘Financial Technology Institutions,’ and will be regarded as equals to banks.

The bill addresses crowdfunding and designates the Bank of Mexico as the final arbiter of which cryptocurrencies will be allowed on the country’s exchanges.

The legislation follows warnings from Mexico’s central bank in late 2017 that Bitcoin is a risky investment and clients should be cautious of scam ICOs.

The legislation was drafted in general terms and it is expected that regulators like National Banks and Securities Commission, the central bank and financial authorities will add specific provisions for companies dealing in the industry.

The Mexican government announced a Blockchain project designed to track public contracts and provide transparency to the public tender process. The country is approaching election season and a presidential candidate was quoted saying he would fight government corruption with Blockchain.


Bitcoin received a warm welcome when it was first unleashed in Argentina in 2015 after a newly elected President lifted stringent monetary policies from the previous administration.

Citizens felt ‘betrayed’ by the manipulated exchange rates and severe inflation of their national currency, and Bitcoin provided a fresh start for the country’s finances.

Argentina’s Central Bank governor was responsible for proposing the July 2018 deadline for regulatory proposals at the G20 summit last month.

The government has also shown an interest in Blockchain and uses a timestamp platform, Dapp, in certain elements of weekly bulletin reports.

Rofex, the largest futures market in Argentina, is considered offering Bitcoin futures to its’ clients as interest in cryptocurrency has grown exponentially since last year.


Cryptocurrency could prove to be a life changer in Brazil, where many don’t have access to traditional banks accounts or adequate financial services.

Brazil’s largest investment firm filed documents with the Department of Federal Revenue to launch an over-the-counter Bitcoin exchange amidst a crackdown on crypto exchanges by major banks in the country. Banks are reportedly closing accounts and suspended services to national exchanges, due to lack of “commercial interest” and concern of illicit activity.

Despite the recent change in policy, the cryptocurrency in Brazil is well established and particularly essential for the population.

In February, a mobile financial service provider, Airfox, released a free app for Brazilians as an answer to the country’s expensive and bureaucratic banking system.

CoinBr, a Brazilian crypto company, partnered with an up-and-coming currency, Dash, and will be provided in over 13,000 locations across the country.

In other interests, cryptocurrency is subject to the authority of the Brazilian tax authority, which considers virtual currency property and requires investors to report capital gains for taxes. Crypto businesses and exchanges are regulated by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) which prohibits local investment funds from buying Bitcoin, and requires exchanges to comply with AML laws.

The former president of Brazil was jailed for his involvement in a government sponsored Bitcoin-based money laundering scheme, in which he misappropriated nearly $22.4 million of government funds.

Since the political turmoil of the scandal, the Brazilian government has invested in a Blockchain-based mobile app that will function as a registry system for signatures and petitions.

The Central Bank of Brazil partnered with the American-based R3 Blockchain alliance, and is using its’ Corda platform to develop Blockchain for different elements of the country’s current financial infrastructure. The bank is also developing proofs-of-concept on four other platforms and focus on using Blockchain for real time gross settlement systems
The government also created a Blockchain-based land-titling system as a platform for registering property ownership. The initiative aims to curb illegal development of land in the Amazon rainforest.

Don’t forget to join our Telegram channel for Crypto, Business & Technolgy news delivered to you daily


Venezuela, a country plagued by hyperinflation and a struggling economy, issued an oil-backed national cryptocurrency, Petro, in February, in an effort to attract foreign investors.

President Nicolas Maduro ordered businesses and government services to accept cryptocurrency and Petro earlier this year. But the order was at odds with the Venezuelan Parliament which declared cryptocurrency illegal just weeks earlier. Critics in parliament argue Maduro is using Petro as a means to skirt US sanctions.

Further, Petro’s release was immediately met with conflict. Bitfinex, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, release a statement condemning and restricting Petro use on the platform due to the US sanctions on Venezuela. President Trump also banned American citizens from purchasing Petro in March as part of a campaign to pressure the country’s autocratic leadership.

Venezuelans are heavily investing in Bitcoin and altcoins to salvage what value remains in their holdings of the national currency, Bolivar.

Mining increased exponentially in response to the devastating inflation of the national currency, but the government reportedly arrested many suspected miners before establishing concrete rules on the practice. The government requires cryptocurrency miners to register on an online registry, which was created at the end of last year and is seen as the first steps toward crypto regulation.

The government continually pushes support for Petro, and even created a cryptocurrency training course for citizens to learn how to buy, sell, and trade Petro.


Two cryptocurrency exchanges requested the Chilean Association of Banks to clarify regulations after the firms’ corporate accounts were rejected by multiple banks in the country.

Chilean banks have been closing similar accounts “out of fear or lack of information” on cryptocurrencies. The exchanges report they are registered with various Chilean agencies and comply with anti money laundering and anti-terrorist funding laws.

A banking executive noted the closures were not out of bias toward cryptocurrency, but reflect a wider banking policy to deny services to accounts that don’t meet the banks financial expectations.

As been reported on April 25, Chile’s anti-monopoly court ordered state bank Banco del Estado de Chile and Itau Corpbanca to re-open Buda’s accounts while the exchange’s lawsuit continues against 10 banks, including the aforementioned two.

Chile’s energy regulatory agency announced a project using the Ethereum Blockchain network to authenticate information in the nation’s energy grid. The agency’s executive secretary noted the transition to Blockchain was for concern of data security.

The project will provide public information on developments and will be instrumental in gaining public trust and understanding of Blockchain tech in South America.


The Bolivian Central Bank outright banned any currency or coins that were not either issued by or regulated through the government as early as in 2014. The bank specifically mentioned Bitcoin, Quark, Peercoin, Namecoin, Primecoin and Feathercoin in the announcement but the statement seemed to include all cryptocurrencies.

In the officials opinion, “It is illegal to use any kind of currency that is not issued and controlled by a government or an authorized entity.” The bank also said that citizens of Bolivia were prohibited from denominating prices in any non-approved currencies.


Ecuadorian government has had a firm negative stance on cryptocurrency over the last four years. On February 16, 2018 the national Central Bank issued a statement which informed the public that Bitcoin is not a means of payment authorized for its use in the country:

The financial transactions carried out through Bitcoin are not controlled, supervised or regulated by any entity in Ecuador, which is why its use represents a financial risk for those who use it. It is important to point out that the purchase and sale of cryptocurrencies – like Bitcoin – through the Internet is not prohibited; However, it is emphasized that Bitcoin is not a legal currency and is not authorized as a means of payment of goods and services in Ecuador, as established in Article 94 of the Monetary and Financial Organic Code.

However, Ecuador has been officially developing its own national cryptocurrency system, the Sistema de Dinero Electrónico, since 2014. The Dinero Electrónico tokens are backed by the assets of Ecuador’s central bank, Banco Central del Ecuador, and pegged one-to-one to the US dollar, which is Ecuador’s national currency.

Here at Dollar Destruction, we endeavour to bring to you the latest, most important news from around the globe. We scan the web looking for the most valuable content and dish it right up for you! The content of this article was provided by the source referenced. Dollar Destruction does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or other materials on this page. As always, we encourage you to perform your own research!


Author Christina Georacopoulos 

Image Credit