Dow Jones Sess Stunning 10% Recovery, But This One Key Factor Could Fuel Even More Growth

Since January 3, within a one-month span, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has recovered from 22,682 points to 25,102 points, by more than 10 percent.

It has been a stunning 30 days for the Dow Jones, which was at risk of entering a bear market after falling by 19 percent from its all-time high.

The short-term recovery of the Dow was mainly attributed to the Federal Reserve rate, which is expected to remain stable in the range of 2.25 percent to 2.5 percent.

But, another key factor may have largely affected the sentiment around the U.S. stock market throughout the past 48 hours.

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: U.S. Shutdown Has Minimal Impact as Dow Jones Recovers Off of It

A Reuters report revealed that contrary to the expectations of investors, the shutdown of the U.S. government last month had minimal impact on jobs.

Throughout the 34-day period, more than 800,000 federal workers missed two paychecks, which account for around 0.5 percent of the workforce of the U.S.

Although the unemployment rate of the U.S. increased to 4 percent as a result of the shutdown, the Labor Department said it had no “discernible” effect on job growth.

Most major industries recorded a rise in job growth from December to January.

  • Employment in construction rose by 52,000 in January
  • Employment in manufacturing increased by 13,000 in January, following a 20,000 increase in December
  • 8,000 federal workers were hired by the government in January

Job growth rose In industries including healthcare, finance, and transportation as well, eliminating the concerns of investors that the shutdown could slow down the recovery of the U.S. Stock market.

With job growth strengthening and increasing at a gradual pace and the Federal Reserve vowing to remain patient on rate hikes, the stock market is expected to sustain its momentum throughout the short-term.

Another Variable: U.S.-China Trade War, Trump Remains Positive

Earlier this week, the U.S. government filed more than 20 charges against Chinese telecom and electronics giant Huawei, fueling the tension between the U.S. and China.

The South China Morning Post reported that the trade talks had been overshadowed by the Huawei indictments, which analysts foresee could lead to a substantial fine for the Chinese company.

A professor at the National University of Singapore David De Cremer said:

“It is likely that Huawei will receive a very big fine. Such a decision would communicate to allies of the U.S. to join in this battle and push Huawei out of their markets.”

If the indictments lead to an export ban on Huawei, local analysts in China said that it could have a major impact on both Huawei and its partners.

Crucially, it could heavily affect the “Made in China 2025” roadmap set forth by the government of China that may alter the outcome of the trade talks.

Jia Mo, a Shanghai-based analyst, told SCMP:

“Imposing an export ban on Huawei will inevitably have a tremendous impact, whether for Huawei or for its business partners in the US.”

Analysts emphasized that the Huawei case has added another uncertainty to the trade discussions between the U.S. and China.

IDC Asia-Pacific vice president Simon Piff added:

“Whether [the Huawei indictments] are due to security concerns, business concerns or political concerns are now so blurred it is difficult to tell what the outcome would be.”

But, U.S. President Donald Trump has said that the meeting is going well with good intent from both sides despite the Huawei dispute, which could serve as a catalyst for the short-term growth of the U.S. economy.

If the job growth is sustained throughout the first quarter of 2019 and the Federal Reserve maintains its rate in the 2.25 to 2.5 percent range, the U.S. stock market could aim for a full-fledged recovery from its December downturn.


Source
Author: Joseph Young 
Image Credit: Featured Image from Shutterstock

Gemini Can Freeze its USD-Pegged Cryptocurrency at Any Time: Researcher

Much has been made in recent days about how Gemini dollar (GUSD), a USD-pegged stablecoin created by the Winklevoss-founded Gemini cryptocurrency exchange, can help regularize cryptocurrency as a mainstream asset class. However, decentralization hardliners may be dismayed by the details of this grand bargain.

GUSD Smart Contract Gives Gemini Broad Control

Writing on tech publication Good Audience, blockchain researcher Alex Lebed performs a code review of the Gemini dollar smart contract, finding that, contrary to the ethos and technical specifications of decentralized cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, GUSD includes a provision that allows its “custodian” — namely Gemini — to freeze any account.

Lebed — who, in full disclosure, is also attached to a separate stablecoin project — further notes that GUSD uses an ERC20Proxy contract that gives Gemini, as the custodian, the ability to upgrade the contract once every 48 hours, giving it among a myriad of other things the power to simultaneously render all tokens non-transferable.

It’s not entirely surprising that Gemini included a mechanism to allow it to freeze funds, given that Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss repeatedly touted GUSD as the first “trusted and regulated digital representation of the U.S. dollar,” both in the official announcement and in subsequent media appearances.

More than just an apparent slight at Tether, the controversial, fully-collateralized stablecoin issuer whose assets are reportedly stored in Puerto Rico, this statement is confirmation that Gemini wants its token to exist alongside and within mainstream finance, not outside of it.

The Gemini dollar whitepaper argues that, because issuing a cryptocurrency whose value is tied to physical assets stored in a centralized location involves some element of trust, that token must have oversight.

“Desirable outcomes in a system that relies (at least in part) on trust requires oversight. In the context of a stablecoin, we submit that the issuer must be licensed and subject to regulatory supervision. From this, transparency and examination become requirements of the system, ensuring its integrity and engendering market confidence…. Gemini operates under the direct supervision and regulatory authority of the New York State Department of Financial Services and is subject to the New York Banking Law and other applicable U.S. laws and regulations.”

That supervision, as detailed above, comes from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), creator of the controversial BitLicense regulatory framework. Gemini, along with fellow New York-based company Paxos, who also released a stablecoin this week, holds an NYDFS charter and must submit to the agency’s stringent regulations governing cryptocurrency companies.

In addition to ensuring that GUSD and the Paxos Standard (PAX) to remain fully backed by physical dollars at all times, the NYDFS said in a statement that it requires the firms to “prevent and respond to any potential or actual wrongful use of stablecoin, including but not limited to its use in illegal activity, market manipulation, or other similar misconduct.”

Additionally, Gemini and Paxos must:

“Implement, monitor and update effective risk-based controls and appropriate BSA/AML and OFAC controls to prevent the Gemini Dollar or Paxos Standard Token from being used in connection with money laundering or terrorist financing.”

Stablecoins: A Corrupt Bargain?

Tether, the largest stablecoin, serves as a proxy for USD on dozens of cryptocurrency exchanges.

Nor is this element of control unique to Gemini’s stable cryptocurrency. Rather, it stems from the inherent centralization of this stablecoin model, regardless of how closely-regulated a particular issuer is. While fully-collateralized stablecoins ensure price stability, their issuers must also submit to regulatory guidelines and other external pressures. (Other stablecoin models, including those that use an algorithmic process to maintain a synthetic peg to the dollar, carry their own risks.)

When Tether’s treasury address was hacked last year, the company released what was effectively an emergency fork to blacklist the more than $30 million in stolen funds and prevent the attackers from spending them. While node operators could technically have refused to follow the fork, the fact that USDT’s underlying assets can only be redeemed from Tether means that the company could have refused to honor tokens on the original chain.

Similarly, GUSD can only be redeemed for physical USD at Gemini, ensuring that, even absent the ability to lock accounts and freeze funds, Gemini has absolute censorship authority over the underlying assets that give the token value. This way, though, Gemini can more effectively halt the flow of funds if they become involved in money laundering or other illicit activities.

Regardless of the justification, many cryptocurrency diehards may find this arrangement a corrupt bargain, but, frankly, GUSD probably wasn’t built with these users in mind anyway.

And, on the other hand, some users may find comfort in the fact that, just as federal and state regulations require Gemini to include functionality that enables them to stop the token from being used for illicit purposes, those regulations also include provisions that should prevent Gemini from arbitrarily freezing funds indefinitely or stealing tokens outright. Holding the token, like storing your funds in a bank, comes with its trade-offs, and users must determine for themselves whether those trade-offs are tenable.


Source
Author: Josiah Wilmoth 
Front Image Credit